Top Things to Know: Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2026)

Updated: August 28, 2026

  1. The Fifth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) developed jointly by ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF provides an updated, evidence-based definition and classification of myocardial infarction (MI) to support consistent diagnosis in both clinical practice and research.
  2. The consensus document introduces a simplified clinical classification that categorizes MI as primary, secondary, or procedure-related based on underlying pathophysiology, aligned with clinical evaluation of patients and supported by objective diagnostic criteria.
  3. The criteria for acute and chronic myocardial injury are refined and the underlying mechanisms discussed in the consensus document. Sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits for cardiac troponin define myocardial injury.
  4. MI is now classified into one of three clinical types:
    • Primary MI: spontaneous presentation due to a primary acute coronary pathology
    • Secondary MI: resulting from myocardial oxygen supply–demand imbalance due to another acute condition, and
    • Procedure-related MI: occurring as a complication of a percutaneous or surgical cardiac procedure.
  5. The definition of MINOCA is updated to ‘myocardial injury with non-obstructive coronary arteries’ in recognition that this is a working rather than final diagnosis.
  6. Accelerated diagnostic pathways using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays are introduced and guidance is provided for the areas of practice in which the interpretation of cardiac troponin is challenging.
  7. The diagnosis of MI following sudden death is discussed and new, objective criteria are provided for silent or unrecognized MI.
  8. New guidance is provided for the diagnosis of MI in low-resource settings.
  9. International Classification of Disease 11th Revision (ICD-11) codes for use in hospital episode statistics and public health monitoring are proposed that align with the updated classification of MI to encourage implementation and further research.
  10. Adoption of the classification in practice and research will ensure the diagnosis of MI is meaningful for patients and clinicians with clear implications for care across healthcare settings.