Skip to main content
class com.aha.ucm.component.cis.TagListPageData=[,docNativeURL=null,docName=UCM_320465,docStatus=RELEASED,dOutDate=null,docSSFileName=UCM_320465_Job-Description---Ad-Hoc-Reviewer.jsp,docTitle=Job Description - Ad Hoc Reviewer,xWebsites=professional,dDocAuthor=t-tim.munoz,xNextReviewDate=11/29/2016 4:51 PM,xTier1=35,xFeaturedItem=No,xElectronicRegistration=No,UserLocale=null,xSubCategory=,dpEvent=null,xComments=Job Description - Ad Hoc Reviewer to support and assist the committee chairs in the review of career development and project support applications.,NoHttpHeaders=null,UserTimeZone=null,xRegionDefinition=GENERIC_RD_COL_1,xVideoRenditions=,xSnippetItem=,xNotes=autoconverted | OID 3053051,UserDateFormat=null,encodeDocUrl=null,isDocProfileDone=null,xKeywords=Job Description, Ad Hoc, job description, ad hoc, reviewer, peer review,xTier2=126,refreshSubMonikers=null,xEditorStepReassignedUsers=null,xLinkTextToDisplay=,dDocAccount=WCM/SOP/RSCH,xEndDateTime=null,xClbraAliasList=null,ClientEncoding=null,xCpdIsLocked=0,xUsageRightsDate=null,xModifyDate=02/26/2016 2:21 AM,xTier3=402,xEventDate=null,dSubscriptionType=null,xCopyright=No,xPackagedConversions=,dSubscriptionAlias=null,xStorageRule=,dpName=null,xDepartment=Technology & Cust. Strategies,dStatus=RELEASED,dPublishType=,xCopyrightDetails=,xSubType=64,isDocProfileUsed=null,xWebsiteObjectType=Data File,xWebFlag=,xSeeAlsoLinks=,xClbraUserList=null,xPartitionId=,xCpdIsTemplateEnabled=0,xLinkWebAddress=,xDontShowInListsForWebsites=,xStartDateTime=null,dInDate=01/11/2016 9:22 PM,xWebsiteSection=professional:1426,dDocName=UCM_320465,dpAction=null,dRevLabel=17,dSecurityGroup=AHAMAH-Public,xCategory=,refreshMonikers=null,xDamConversionType=,dDocFormats=null,xAssociatedImage=,dDocType=SingleColumn,xBusinessOwner=Business Owner,xUploadDate=null,xDiscussionCount=0,xMainFlowEntryCriteria=True,xItemInformation=,xUsageRights=,xDiscussionType=N/A,xRecipeTaxonomy=,dSubscriptionID=null,dOriginalName=UCM_320465.xml,xProfileTrigger=SingleColumn,dLocation=,dRevisionID=10,dPublishState=,dReleaseState=Y,xTrashDeleter=null,dMessage=,dWebExtension=xml,dExtension=xml,dProcessingState=Y,xTrashDeleteName=null,dIsCheckedOut=0,xForceFolderSecurity=null,dRevClassID=403678,dIsPrimary=1,dFileSize=13713,dIndexerState=,dFlag1=,xviaAddNewContentService=,dIsWebFormat=0,xCollectionID=null,dRevRank=0,xReadOnly=null,dCheckoutUser=,dFormat=Application/xml,dWorkflowState=,dDocID=1608343,dRendition2=,dRendition1=,xInhibitUpdate=null,dReleaseDate=02/26/2016 4:25 AM,xTrashDeleteLoc=null,dCreateDate=01/11/2016 9:25 PM,xHidden=null,labelTier1=ResearchPrograms,labelTier2=PeerReview,labelTier3=,labelTier4=,mobileNavURL=DEFAULT2_VALUE_FROM_getDataForAdvanceSearch,xContactPhoneNumber=,xContactEmailAddress=,xContactName=,xATGRolesDisciplines=,xPublishDate=null,xRobotParameter=,xCommunities=,xMembershipLevel=,rsCalories=null,rsSodium=null,rsRecipeTaxonomy=null,rsServings=null,rsTotalTime=null,rsTotalFat=null,rsTotalCarbs=null,rsFeaturedImage=null,xDisplayComments=

Ad Hoc Reviewer

Charge

To support and assist the committee chairs in the review of career development and project support applications.

Appointment

  • Ad Hoc Reviewers may be appointed on a temporary basis for a review meeting to participate fully in the peer review process.
  • Ad Hoc Reviewers may be invited for additional review meetings or cycles and may be subsequently appointed as regular members of a Peer Review Committee.
  • Ad Hoc Reviewers may constitute no more than one-third of the total committee roster at any one peer review meeting.

Equipment Requirements

For face-to-face meetings, a PC or Apple laptop with wireless internet access is required.

Time Commitment

  • Time commitment for critiques of application reviews and pre-meeting orientations.
  • If the review group is meeting face-to-face, 1 to 2.5 days may be required for peer review meetings and travel time. Less time may be required for a web-based meeting, though members are expected to dedication a full day on the established meeting date.

Responsibilities

  • Ad Hoc Reviewers should have a workload which does not exceed that for regular members, i.e., 9-12 written critiques per reviewer with 3 additional reader assignments. Workload may be lower for those Ad Hoc Reviewers without prior review experience, but should not be less that six written critiques with additional reader assignments.
  • Evaluate merit of assigned applications relative to the peer review criteria.
  • Assign a preliminary score and prepare a written critique on the Grants@Heart (G@H) system which will be provided to applicants. The critique should be fair, objective, scholarly, and offer positive constructive criticism to the applicant.
  • Post all preliminary scores and critiques on the Grants@Heart website within the allotted timeframe.
  • During or following peer review meetings, modify critique as necessary, to reflect the discussion and recommended scoring at the meeting.

Qualifications

  • Minimum Assistant Professor career level or equivalent.
  • Nationally recognized competence in one or more fields of biomedical research.
  • Current or recent independent peer reviewed funding typically at the national level; or equivalent research funding for reviewers employed in industry or government.
  • Consistent record of peer reviewed publications within the past 5 years.
  • Knowledge of the AHA and commitment to its mission.
  • Mature judgment and objectivity.
  • Ability to work effectively in a group.

Method of Appointment

  • Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers can be nominated by; the study group chairperson; study group members; Research Committee members and self nominations through G@H.
  • Prior to appointment, the candidate’s credentials must be reviewed by the unified steering committee.